EPR can be implemented in many different ways. Thus far, in Europe, 30
countries have implemented EPR in their legislation and the industry has set up
PROs. In some of these countries, the scheme has achieved great success,
particularly due to clear legislation coupled with genuine cooperation between
all of the actors involved in the waste management chain. Actors include
governments, local authorities, producers and waste management organisations.
EPR schemes rely on either national regulations or specific legislation
for the waste streams they are part of. For example, EPR schemes for household
and municipal waste are generally based on the producers’ financial
responsibility because they have been mostly introduced when the schemes were
already in place and managed by local public authorities. By contrast, the EPR
implementation for non-municipal waste varies significantly, and can for
example be based on business-to-business arrangements. Solely in Belgium, the
obliged industry has set up a specific PRO for industrial and commercial waste,
VALIPAC. Its major role consists of monitoring packaging collection and
recycling, in relation to the volumes brought on the market, collecting the
respective data and motivating companies to separately collect their packaging
waste.
Not all PROs have the same functions. As EPR requirements differ
between countries, the role of PROs vary as well. In Sweden, for instance,
producers have to participate financially only in the treatment of end-of-life
vehicles whereas they have full financial and organisational responsibility for
graphic paper.
Key differing features include the following:
• Type of responsibility,
either financial or organisational.
• Presence of competition
among PROs and among waste treatment operators.
• Transparency and
surveillance features such as free-riders’ surveillance, waste management
activities and PROs
• PROs in hands of
obliged industry (Belgium, Czech Republic, Ireland, Italy, France, Netherlands,
Norway, Portugal, Spain): Obliged industry creates one common non -profit
entity that collects the necessary funding,cooperates with local authorities
and ensuresrecycling in the most cost-efficient and environmental way.
• Dual model (Austria,
Germany, Sweden): Industry has full operational and financial responsibility
over collection, sorting and recycling. There is a separate collection system
designated to local authorities but their influence is minimal.
• Shared model (France,
Spain, Belgium, Netherlands, Italy, Czech Republic, Slovenia,): The
responsibility is shared between industry and the local authorities based on
common agreements regarding collection. Municipalities are responsible for
collection, and often for sorting of packaging waste, arising on the municipal
level, while industry’s financial responsibility differs from country to
country.
• Tradable Credits Model
(UK, partly Poland): There is neither a link between industry and
municipalities nor differentiation between commercial and packaging arising at
the municipal level.
• Vertical integrated
systems (Germany, Poland, Slovenia, Romania, Bulgaria): Several, usually
profit-orientedentities compete to attract obliged companies. In vertical
integrated systems, waste management differs from country to country.
• Sharing the collection
infrastructure (Germany):Inhabitants have access to a common container and the
collected packaging waste is split between the various PROs prior to being
sorted. In this case, the cost distribution is established by a clearing house.
• Competing on the
infrastructure (Estonia): Every PRO offers its own container to inhabitants.
• PROs only responsible
for packaging arising at the municipal level (Belgium, Germany, France, Spain),
for commercial packaging (Belgium), or for integrated packaging waste streams
(Netherlands, Italy, Czech Republic).
• Each PRO in a separate
district (Poland, Romania, Bulgaria, Slovakia, Malta, Latvia, Lithuania): Each
PRO signs up with as many municipalities as needed to fulfil targets according
to market shares.
EPR as a regulatory regime framework has been practiced by much legislation,
but it is not a name for a regulation in itself. In contrast, the EU
regulations such as the WEEE Directive, the Battery Law and the Packaging Law
are equivalent to the regime in EU and German legislative practice.
So the French and German WEEE, Packaging Law and Battery Law
regulations are all part of the EPR and are the embodiment of the EPR in that
country.
In Germany, the EPR registration number(s) stands as proof of
compliance. To get this number(s), you have to register with the relevant EPR
registry (see table below). Once you receive the EPR registration number(s),
you will need to communicate it to Amazon as proof of compliance. During Q4
2021, Amazon will share the link to upload the EPR registration number(s).
The EPR categories and Producer Responsibility Organisations are
detailed in the table below.
The following registration numbers stand for your proof of compliance:
• Packaging:
Registrierungsnummer
• EEE: WEEE-Reg.-Nr.DE
• Battery: Batt-Reg.-Nr.
DE2
*Battery obligation: In Germany, if you offer an EEE product containing
a battery, you have to register for both EEE and Battery. Amazon will only
require the EEE registration number at this stage.
Where
can I find more information on EPR for Germany?
For more information, we encourage you to get familiar with the
respective laws (ElektroG and VerPackG)
and refer to the websites of the Producer Responsibility Organisation as well
as sites given below:
• Packaging – https://www.verpackungsregister.org/en/lucid-packaging-register/about-the-packaging-register/registration-at-a-glance
• WEEE and Batteries – https://www.stiftung-ear.de/en/topics/elektrog/producers-ar/registration
With the law "to combat waste and promote recycling" of 10 February
20201, France has extended producer liability (EPR) to additional products and
tightened it for existing products. In France, the principle of extended
producer responsibility has been enshrined in law since 1975.The first
nationwide system was introduced in 1992 for the collection of packaging waste
from private final consumers. Later, similar systems were introduced for
batteries and accumulators, paper, electrical and electronic equipment, etc.
Meanwhile there are about 20 different EPR systems ("channels") in
France.
In France, Amazon will require your EPR registration number(s). To get
this number(s), you have to register with the relevant Producer Responsibility
Organisation (see table below). Once you receive the EPR registration
number(s), you will need to communicate it to Amazon. During Q4 2021, Amazon
will share the link to upload the EPR registration number(s).
Starting in January 2022, to be EPR compliant, a new registration
number called the ‘Identifiant Unique’ (Unique Identification Number) will be
available on your Producer Responsibility Organisation portal(s). You will also
need to provide Amazon with this new EPR registration number.
The EPR categories and Producer Responsibility Organisations are
detailed in the table below.
1. PACKAGING related
obligation: In France, you are accountable for your primary packaging and the
secondary packaging added by you.
Where
can I find more information on EPR for France?
For more information, we encourage you to refer to the websites of the
Producer Responsibility Organisation as well as sites given below for more
information:
•
https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/jorf/id/JORFTEXT000041553759/
•
https://www.ecologie.gouv.fr/cadre-general-des-filieres-responsabilite-elargie-des-producteurs
•
https://www.ademe.fr/expertises/dechets/elements-contexte/filieres-a-responsabilite-elargie-producteurs-rep
created with
WordPress Website Builder .